Your Reading List

A vaccine that saved the cattle industry

Vet Advice with Dr. Ron Clarke

Although the efficacy of blackleg vaccines is occasionally disputed in North America, there are few veterinary practitioners who would be comfortable convincing producers to stop using the vaccine.

Blackleg, a disease of many ruminants, is universal. It is most commonly seen in sheep, cattle and goats. Outbreaks have been reported in farmed bison and deer. The acute nature of the disease makes successful treatment difficult.

Although the efficacy of commonly used blackleg vaccines has been disputed by the occasional academic based on the lack of vigorous, randomized, controlled trials, few practitioners in Western Canada and across cattle states in the U.S. would be comfortable convincing producers to stop using blackleg vaccine. Stories abound in rural veterinary clinics about investigations into sudden death losses on pasture due to clostridial disease, much of it caused by Clostridium chauvoei (blackleg). Early in the 1900s, blackleg vaccine saved an industry.

A paper published in the Journal of San Diego History (1965) describes the decimation of California’s range-cattle industry between 1870 and 1912. In the article, author Hazel Adele Pulling writes about the ranching industry of the times:

“The forces detrimental to the range-cattle industry after the 1860s were forces which developed momentum over a long period of years. To the cattleman with a long-time view of his business they were forces which challenged his initiative and strength. To every man ranching, there were two ever-impending threats: drought and disease, against either of which there was little to do. Drought came, or it did not; disease came and for long years threatened in all its virulence to stay.”

In California, before vaccines were available, blackleg killed an estimated 21 per cent of young cattle. With the introduction of rudimentary vaccines around 1897, losses in vaccinated cattle by 1904 fell to less than one per cent.

Two historical documents, one titled Blackleg Vaccines: Their Production and Use, and the second, Blackleg and Vaccination, both published in1904 by the Kansas Agriculture Experimental Station provide a similar account of blackleg’s prevalence and clinical characteristics in Kansas and Colorado:

“Cattle over two years of age may become affected; a few cases of old cattle dying from blackleg have been reported. Good, fat, beef calves are very susceptible, while poor, thin calves and calves of dairy breeds are more resistant.

“Blackleg — also known as black quarter, quarter ill and symptomatic-anthrax — is an acute, infectious, but noncontagious disease of cattle, and occasionally of other ruminants. It has been reported to occur in swine. This disease is characterized by a sudden appearance of lameness, followed by a rapid development of muscular and subcutaneous swellings containing gas. These symptoms are followed by prostration and death in 12 to 48 hours.

“Blackleg is found throughout the western half of the United States, especially in the Southwestern states and the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. In Canada blackleg is found in the western provinces; in Europe, in the mountainous districts of Germany and Austria, and to a less extent in France, Switzerland, and England.

“Losses from blackleg are greatest during the seasons of the year when calves are making their best gains — in the spring after the calves have been put on pasture and in the fall when they are taken off the dried pastures and put in the feedlot. It appears that blackleg causes greater losses in the southern and western states than all other diseases combined. The losses are placed at from 10 to 20 per cent of the young stock.”

The same report outlined a study that incorporated 100,000 doses of improved vaccine. Blackleg losses in the population of vaccinated cattle were under one per cent.

Prior to 1782, the scientists considered blackleg a particular form of anthrax, with both diseases being treated in various ways, many of which bordered on pure witchcraft. In 1782 Chabert (1790) clinically differentiated the two diseases and described blackleg as “symptomatic anthrax.” From 1782 until the isolation of the etiological agent by Bollinger in 1875, and Feser in 1876, the scientific community recorded little progress in blackleg control. Numerous methods of vaccination, crude compared to modern systems, were developed and slowly moved from the research bench to the field.

Airlong, Cornevin, and Thomas (1887), developed an attenuated muscle vaccine, used with moderate success in France. Nocard and Roux (1887) used attenuated pure cultures of C. chauvoei, and Roux (1888) used filtrates of broth cultures. Kitt (1894) developed a single muscle-powder vaccine and also used semi-virulent pure cultures. Kitt in 1900 used immune horse serum with varying success, and became the first to develop a method of growing C. chauvoei aerobically (without air). Kitasato (1889) immunized guinea pigs by the use of pure cultures. Duenschmann (1894) used filtered muscle juices for the immunization of guinea pigs. Thomas of Verdun, France, used threads impregnated in cultures of C. chauvoei inserted through the skin to stimulate immunity.

It became evident early in the vaccine story that timing of vaccine use accounted for success or failure of a protective immune response. Other than the labour involved, use of blackleg vaccine calmed the worries of unsustainable losses of pastured calves. Saving one calf paid for a large number of doses.

Many of the principles established to prevent blackleg through the early 1900s remain in veterinary textbooks today, basically unchanged, exceptions made for modifications of modern adjuvants (chemicals that stimulate immunity) and sterile killed vaccine production. Things like:

  • Immunity produced by the use of blackleg vaccines did not develop for three to 10 days after injection, but protective immunity existed for a significant duration.
  • Early vaccination minimized losses from blackleg.
  • Production issues meant the efficacy of some vaccines remained questionable.
  • Losses prior to routine vaccination of livestock ranged from three to 25 per cent of all young cattle in many districts in the west and southwest. Losses following vaccination with even older blackleg vaccines were less than one in 10,000.

In the words of an early Kansas cattleman, “The course of the cattle industry has been long and difficult. With the scourge of blackleg under control, its survival remains.”

About the author


Dr. Ron Clarke

Dr. Ron Clarke prepares this column on behalf of the Western Canadian Association of Bovine Practitioners. Suggestions for future articles can be sent to Canadian Cattlemen ([email protected]) or WCABP ([email protected]).



Stories from our other publications